换妻社区

An Enduring Tradition

This article was originally published in the August 1997 issue of News from 换妻社区 in advance of the college鈥檚 celebration of 100 years with the Pull tug-of-war that fall.

It started in a different era. But it's aged well.

When the 1898 Pull (the first on record) was held, Victoria was queen of England, and William McKinley was president of the United States. Teddy Roosevelt and the Rough Riders hadcharged up San Juan Hill just a few months before. Closer to home, the founding of 换妻社区 in 1866 was still a living memory 鈥� as, for that matter, was the 1847 founding of Holland. Gerrit J. Kollen, Class of 1868, was Hope鈥檚 president. 

The first Pull reference is an all-too-brief note in the Anchor of November, 1898: 鈥淐ome out and see the tug-of-war between the Sophomores and the A鈥檚 and Freshmen.鈥�

Those students of long ago can鈥檛 have had any notion of what they started, but what a storied legacy it is. The event endures still, with two teams of 36 (18 鈥減ullers鈥� on the rope, and 18 鈥渕oralers鈥� serving as their eyes) battling across the Black River every fall. 

And, grueling though the experience is 鈥� indeed, in part because it is grueling 鈥� many participants compliment it as a highlight of their time at Hope. 

There鈥檚 no word later in 1898 of the outcome of that year鈥檚 Pull. In fact, references to the Pull are absent entirely for the next several years. 

The waters are even muddied a bit by notes from two alumni who were students in 1909 and wrote years later to explain that the event originated then. 

The current hypothesis is that the tug-of-war took a hiatus sometime after 1898, so that those involved in the 1909 event weren鈥檛 aware that there鈥檇 been a freshman-sophomore tug-of-war before them (or, at least the letter-writers weren't aware of it). Given the 1898 Anchor reference and an anecdotal history of 50-plus years in support of the 19th century start, the college has stuck with the idea that it鈥檚 all part of the same tradition.

But鈥� just who were the 鈥淎鈥檚,鈥� and why were they teamed with the freshmen that first year? 

Back in 1898, Hope operated a high school. Actually, the high school predated the college itself 鈥� Hope became a way for the local high school graduates to attend college close to home (imagine traveling all the way to Rutgers in New Jersey, which at the time had ties to the Reformed Church, and was one likely alternative, in the 1860s... ). The four grade levels in the high school were designated with letters, and the 鈥淎鈥檚鈥� were the seniors. 

In the fall of 1898, the sophomore class consisted of 27 men, while the freshman class had only 16 men and two women. No doubt adding some men from the 鈥淎鈥� class, which had 23 of them, helped even the odds. 

The 鈥淎鈥檚鈥� don't reappear in Pull lore. By 1910 the 鈥渢ug,鈥� as described in the Anchor, had assumed a more familiar form (although with some twists): 

鈥淐omplete preparations had been previously made, and when the tug started no one would venture any opinion as to the outcome... When the signal was given the Freshmen gave a united pull, but their experienced opponents had established themselves so firmly that one of the knots in the rope gave way. When the rope had again been tied the tug was renewed. Neither side would yield. Each man had fortified himself to the utmost, only to find his strength equally matched. Finally, after a long and continued pull, the Freshmen through united heavings brought the Sophs foot by foot.鈥�

The intensity of the period鈥檚 freshman-sophomore rivalry also becomes apparent in early Pull accounts. In 1916, the sophomore Class of 鈥�19 even published a handbill warning the freshman Class of 鈥�20 to 鈥淭ake Heed鈥� at the approach of the encounter at the Black River. In verse on the reverse it predicted: 

A shot rang out, the pull was on, 

It was sad as sad could be.

The Freshmen looked pale, thin and wan, 

The SOPHOMORES happy and free.

The poetry reflected a generally good-natured hazing of freshmen, particularly by sophomores, that was common on college campuses in the United States at the time 鈥� and for many decades afterward. At Hope, the freshmen even wore green beanies, called 鈥減ots,鈥� as a sign of their 鈥渘ewbie鈥� status. 

The Pull was pay-back time. A win was a chance for the frosh to show that they weren't the wet-nosed neophytes that the arrangement made them out to be. 

There was also a more tangible reward. 

Reported Janet Baird 鈥�58 Weisiger, whose team won as freshmen: 鈥淲hat made the event so grand was that by winning the Pull, we no longer had to wear our 鈥榩ots.鈥欌��

The sophomores in 1916, incidentally, weren鈥檛 quite the oracles they thought they were. The Pull that year ended in a draw after one hour and 45 minutes when two physicians present said that the strain was endangering the participants. As it happened, the doctors were particularly concerned about the Class of 鈥�19, which was on lower ground and lying in wet pits. 

The 1916 draw was the first of four in Pull history. The others were in 1926 (although the sophomores won a tie-breaking basketball game), 1952 and 1977. 

The 1977 Pull was an extreme test of endurance. After three hours and 51 minutes, with the light failing and the health of the participants 鈥� as in 1916 鈥� a concern, the event was called a tie. To help avoid such problems in the future, new rules were created for 1978 allowing the judges to declare a winner by measurement if neither side has claimed the rope after three hours.

There are four cancellations on record: in 1918, 1943 and 1944 because of World Wars I and II, and in 1957 because of a campus-wide flu epidemic.

The Pull has experienced a variety of changes through the years. The current method of pulling 鈥� lying along the rope for the duration 鈥� is a style of recent decades. In earlier years, the teams were prone for the beginning of the event (15 minutes) but then stood simultaneously and 鈥減ulled鈥� upright to the end.

The 1898 Anchor reference doesn鈥檛 include a site, but the late Rev. Berend T. Vander Woude Sr. 鈥�13 remembered a creek near Pilgrim Home Cemetery as hosting the 1909 contest and being at the Black River in 1910.

The team size has been a constant for most of the Pull鈥檚 history, but it wasn鈥檛 always so. For example, the late Dr. Gerrit John Van Zoeren 鈥�12 recalled his sophomore team in 1909 as being 鈥渙utnumbered two to one. Time less than five minutes.鈥� The October, 1910, Anchor, even reports that 鈥淏ecause of the disadvantage in foot-holds and the unfavorable lay of the ground the Freshmen were permitted to have two extra men, so as to even up the pull.鈥�

For most of the Pull鈥檚 history, men served on the rope and women acted as the 鈥渕oralers,鈥� long called 鈥渕orale girls.鈥� The term was changed earlier this decade to reflect the idea that either gender can participate either way, and Keri Law 鈥�99 became the first woman to compete as a puller in 1995. 

The Pull has found its way into the national and even international media, from The Guinness Book of World Records (1995, maybe others... ) to Sports Illustrated (twice 鈥� in 1966 and 1996); from a magazine in Japan (1983) to Australian television (1996).

The win-loss record favors the sophomores and even-years. There鈥檚 a sports adage, though, to the effect that any team can beat any other on any given day, and no Pull team relies on the weight of history to assure the outcome. 

Neither, though, is winning the only thing. Listen to Pull participants, and you鈥檒l learn that the event is as much about friendship, and teamwork and pushing oneself as it is about winning or losing. 

鈥淚t鈥檚 that sense of family and that sense of teamwork and also what you learn about yourself 鈥� that sense of your endurance,鈥� said Amy Strassburger 鈥�98 VanStee, who spent four years involved in the event. 鈥淎fter doing it my freshman year, I couldn't imagine coming back to Hope and not doing it again.鈥�

In a 1988 interview for News from 换妻社区, coach Gary Kunzi 鈥�89 shared a bit more on the appeal when he discussed the challenge of reaching beyond limits. 鈥淭here is no way that anybody can just get on a rope and pull for three hours. I'm convinced that it鈥檚 physically impossible. The only way to do it is to go beyond what you ever think you can do.鈥�

It鈥檚 the timelessness of those quests 鈥� to connect meaningfully with others, and to reach one鈥檚 best 鈥� that helps the Pull endure. The Pull is a new discovery, and a chance for self-discovery, for each and every person who鈥檚 a part of it. 

Tradition without heart is only habit. It is a ceremony that has lost touch with its meaning. 

The Pull is one tradition that remains fresh. It finds its heart each year in the dedicated individuals who commit themselves to working together to do the impossible.